Frederick Charles Beiser is an American author and professor of philosophy at Syracuse He has since edited two Cambridge anthologies on Hegel, The Cambridge Companion to Hegel () and The Cambridge Companion to Hegel and. Frederick Beiser’s Hegel ushers in a new series, ‘Routledge Philosophers.’ The list of contributing authors is a distinguished one, yet nobody. In this magisterial and lucid introduction, Frederick Beiser covers every major aspect of Hegel’s thought. He places Hegel in the historical context of.
|Published (Last):||19 January 2006|
|PDF File Size:||5.97 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||4.48 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Does not really engage with contemporary retrievals of Hegel, however.
Frederick C. Beiser – Wikipedia
Goodreads helps you keep track of books hwgel want to read. Jul 01, tom bomp rated it really liked it Shelves: From his first book — The Fate of Reason — on the context of Kantian critique, Beiser established a reputation which was only strengthened by a string of publications on Idealist and Romantic “constellations” of thought.
Of course, this is no substitute to reading Hegel himself, but I’ve found it to be an excellent sampler and tour guide. Beiser may or may not be justified in concluding that the owl of Minerva has flown from her roost over Hegel’s grave, but something of the spirit of Hegel lives on in this book. Beiser concludes that “it is a moral rather than a metaphysical refutation of nihilism” — which among other things ignores the moments of labor I express myself in my own workof service, and of fear and trembling.
The dynamicity and openness of Hegel’s thought consists precisely in this failing process as a process. I am definitely not qualified to pass judgment on his resolution of any of the interpretive questions that he discusses. Beiser bluntly dispels the myth of thesis-antithesis-synthesis, but it seems to hold implicitly for each chapter.
The book is overall a well-written, comprehensive and lucid text that offers the student an admirable introduction the thought of Hegel. Yet to rule out of court such recent linguistic interpretations as, e.
Albert Lea, MinnesotaU.
Jun 10, Raully rated it really liked it Shelves: In a remarkable fashion it fused the rationalist, voluntarist and historicist traditions, preserving their truths and canceling their errors” Retrieved 7 December You can read, similarly, attraction criticises upon Hegel’s thoughts and other philosophers impress -like Spinoza and Kant- on the philosophy of Hegel.
The major failure of the book, at least in my view, is in neglecting to provide sufficient reason why Hegel should be fredericck Philosophy students will need to go on to more focussed books Houlgate is good for the next levelbut this is a rich, interesting study that you’ll wish other scholars emulated. The intuition they championed, on the other hand, reveals only an inchoate and underdeveloped image of the infinite. Jan 13, Andrew rated it it was amazing.
Naturphilosophieboth in their centrality to any historical understanding of German Idealism, as well as their continued relevance to contemporary philosophy.
The ideas themselves are fascinating and presented in a way that I was interested even when I thought they were total bollocks.
Frederick C. Beiser
Beiser Routledge- Philosophy – pages 0 Reviews https: At the same time, I felt he introduced new readings of specific theoretical questions doing a good job presenting the conflicting viewpoints and defending his interpretation with interesting arguments as well textual references.
Jun 27, Sarah Gutierrez Myers rated it it was amazing Shelves: Want to Freferick Currently Reading Read.
Here Beiser draws upon some of the most recent scholarship on the German romantic generation, in particular the work of Dieter Heinrich and Michael Franz. The Curious Case of Hegel. Luke Brennan rated it really liked it Jun 04, Beiser even makes the vaulting ideas about Geist less daunting and alien.
Frederick Beiser, Hegel – PhilPapers
Sign in Create an account. Many of the central difficulties that Hegel and others of the time were trying to navigate at the time are set forward with clear and almost analytic precision, yet the book does not seem to sacrifice careful and nuanced interpretation to simplicity of style.
However, the presentation was very clear and made a lot of sense. It’s all about who Hegel was within his specific historical context.